david ray mccoy sheila daniels chicagohow to play spiderheck multiplayer
Further, the testimony established that McCoy, who was a paraplegic since 1968, routinely carried a black .38 caliber handgun. 26/02/2023 . There is no question that a criminal defendant's prerogative to testify at his own trial is a fundamental right; the question of the exercise of that right is thus not a matter of a strategic or tactical decision best left to trial counsel. The instant case is similar to Enis and dissimilar to Jones. Defense counsel's use of Sheila's statement was thus further support for counsel's arguments that defendant was not accountable for Sheila's actions. Defendant then took the gun away from his sister and put it in his pocket. mode: 'thumbnails-rr1', In fact, the section of Cleary and Graham relating to the admission of medical and hospital records explains that while the requirement of calling all persons who made the entries to testify has virtually disappeared with respect to the admission of business records, it continues to be applied to medical records. This new evidence would not cure defendant's inability to establish that he sustained an injury. Hinton, 302 Ill.App.3d at 625, 236 Ill.Dec. Considering the facts of the instant case, we simply cannot say that the State has meet its burden to show that the evidence was so overwhelming that the crime was accompanied by exceptionally brutal or heinous behavior indicative of wanton cruelty so that we have no doubt that a jury would have made this finding. As the defendant in the instant case objected to her sentence in the circuit court and on her direct appeal, we apply a harmless error analysis. Defendant makes much about the fact that the jury wanted to review the medical records, arguing that because the jurors were denied access to the records, they probably believed defendant was lying about the beating and therefore, convicted her for that reason. 1000, 688 N.E.2d 693 (1997), the defendant was arrested in 1983 and taken to Area 2 where, after being interrogated, he admitted to his involvement in the murder under investigation. She signed the court-reported statement without reading it because she did not have her eyeglasses. However, she did not attempt to call Tyrone at the hearing on her motion. People v. Enis, 163 Ill.2d 367, 387, 206 Ill.Dec. Please try again. In determining that the defendant had failed to show that the sentencing error in his case was prejudicial, the court in Crespo held: we have no doubt that a jury, presented with these facts, would have found that the crime was committed in a brutal and heinous manner, indicative of wanton cruelty. Crespo, 203 Ill.2d at 348-49, 273 Ill.Dec. To warrant the use of a pretrial subpoena, a defendant must show: (1) that the documents requested are evidentiary and relevant; (2) that the documents are not otherwise procurable reasonably in advance of trial by exercise of due diligence; (3) that he or she cannot properly prepare for trial without production and inspection in advance of trial and that failure to obtain an inspection may tend to unreasonably delay trial; and (4) that the application is made in good faith and is not intended as a general fishing expedition. Shukovsky, 128 Ill.2d at 225, 131 Ill.Dec. In a motion to cite additional authority filed after oral arguments were heard in this case, defendant cited the recent holding in People v. Jones, 315 Ill.App.3d 500, 504, 248 Ill.Dec. 2052, 2065; People v. Whittaker (1990), 199 Ill.App.3d 621, 627, 145 Ill.Dec. Following a hearing on the motion, the trial court denied the motion. He was 52 years old. See also People v. Watts (1992), 226 Ill.App.3d 519, 168 Ill.Dec. The court ordered an in camera inspection of records naming officers in relevant police reports, who had complaints of physical abuse or civil lawsuits for abuse filed against them. Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life. In connection with the motion to suppress, defendant filed two subpoenas duces tecum upon the City, requesting, inter alia, the production of all documents relating to disciplinary complaints against any of the officers at Area 2 who were expected to be called as witnesses at her trial. A South Side woman has been convicted for the second time of killing millionaire David Ray McCoy, her live-in boyfriend, in 1988. Father of actress LisaRaye McCoy. Following an investigation and attempts to trace the gun, police spoke with, and later arrested, Sheila Daniels, defendant's sister. 82, 502 N.E.2d 345 (1986). Sheila then left the room and Cummings interviewed defendant again. Owned motels and nightclubs in Chicago. 498, 563 N.E.2d 385 (1990), which in turn relied upon the holding in People v. Taylor, 50 Ill.2d 136, 277 N.E.2d 878 (1971). As to the scope of the subpoenas, the defendant in Hinton sought only the complaints of excessive force made against the detectives who were identified in the defendant's case. Tyrone claimed he shotMcCoy only after his sister, Sheila, delivered the fatal shot to McCoys head. 321, 696 N.E.2d 313 (1998) (Hobley II). She was born to a Chicago city bus driver mother Nadine Brewer and businessman father David Ray McCoy. 2052, 2064-65; People v. Davidson (1990), 196 Ill.App.3d 634, 638, 143 Ill.Dec. Judge Toomin cited several cases which supported his holding and made extremely detailed findings of fact. placement: 'Right Rail Thumbnails', During its deliberations, the jury sent a note to the trial court asking if plaintiff's medical records pertaining to the 1980 beating were available to the jury. 58, 539 N.E.2d 368. Counsel also asserted that cases had been decided by the United States Supreme Court since this court had issued Daniels I that had the effect of changing the law regarding the admissibility of defendant's statements. Similarly, defendant argues the trial court should have admitted the medical records in this case because they supported her claim of self-defense in that they related to her state of mind at the time she shot McCoy. As for Anthony, the police picked him up after defendant falsely implicated him as being involved in the homicide. We reject defendant's argument that this is new evidence. However, we are unpersuaded by defendant's reliance upon Thompson. Defendant also argues that the trial court erred in failing to allow her to reopen her case in light of the testimony Tyrone and Anthony would present at a hearing on her motion to suppress. People v. Mordican, 64 Ill.2d 257, 1 Ill.Dec. 2052, 2068, 80 L.Ed.2d 674.) 528, 589 N.E.2d 928. Her second trial, held in August before Cook County Criminal Court Judge Joseph Urso, ended in the same verdict. This position is completely belied by the record. Shortly after arriving at the police station, the detectives confronted defendant with the fact that she owned the gun. 457, 133 L.Ed.2d 383 (1995), her original motion to suppress would have been granted. The fact that Lt. Cline was of the opinion that defendant was not under arrest and not in custody does not alter the fact that Judge Toomin applied the proper test and concluded that her admissions to police were admissible. Defense counsel specifically asked Detective Cummings whether there was "anything in any of Mr. Daniels' statements that would lead you to believe that Tyrone Daniels did anything to aid, assist or participate with Sheila Daniels in any way until after Sheila Daniels had shot Mr. McCoy," to which Cummings answered, "No." The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is thus affirmed. People v. Fields, 258 Ill.App.3d 912, 918, 197 Ill.Dec. As a result of the beating, defendant sought treatment at Little Company of Mary Hospital. 12, 751 N.E.2d 65 (2001). After the prosecution rested, the defense presented no witnesses; however, the defense did offer into evidence Sheila Daniels' statement made to police. She also stated that Anthony had been beaten by the police in an attempt by the officers to frighten, intimidate and otherwise coerce [her] into making admissions to the crime charged. Defendant again sought a hearing on her motion to suppress. The fact that defendant did not ask for this to be done indicates that defendant's theory in her first motion to suppress had nothing to do with Tyrone's condition. A proper foundation is necessary for the admission of hospital records. The court also found that probable cause existed after defendant spoke with the polygraph operator and admitted knowledge of the murder. Her brother, Tyrone, was convicted and is serving a 60-year sentence for shooting McCoy twice more to make sure he was dead. After hearing the testimony and the arguments of counsel, the court denied defendant's motion, finding that the police had probable cause to arrest defendant and that defendant's statements were not coerced by the police, but rather were voluntarily given. Moreover, the record is devoid of any evidence demonstrating that defendant's statement was involuntary due to his emotional condition. In the present cause, the order was to quash an arrest and suppress evidence, period. 154, 704 N.E.2d 727 (1998). The police told him that if he did not cooperate his sister might get the death penalty. She agreed to go along with the police because she was no longer able to resist and she wanted to go home. This court recently addressed this issue. 509, 554 N.E.2d 444. Accordingly, the judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed in part, vacated in part and this case is remanded for resentencing. This court first looked to the holdings in People v. Hobley, 159 Ill.2d 272, 202 Ill.Dec. We further note that there was credible evidence in the record that the deceased was an abusive domestic partner, indicating the existence of mitigating factors under sections 5-5-3.1(a)(4) and (a)(8) of the Unified Code of Corrections. Enis, 163 Ill.2d at 387 [206 Ill.Dec. Defendant then wiped all fingerprints off Sheila's gun and left it in the car by McCoy, locking all the doors of the car, which he left there. 592, 610 N.E.2d 16 (1992). Daniels I, 272 Ill.App.3d at 333, 208 Ill.Dec. sunderland ontario new homes / can alcohol make you gain weight overnight / david ray mccoy; david ray mccoy . Defendant first contends that Judge Urso erred in denying her a hearing on her motions to suppress filed after this court's decision in Daniels I. This court rejected all of these arguments, finding that the circuit court properly denied her motion to suppress. Daniels I, 272 Ill.App.3d at 336, 208 Ill.Dec. Before trial, counsel for defendant filed several motions to suppress statements made by defendant after his arrest and to suppress evidence the police recovered in defendant's apartment. Indeed, Tyrone raised this issue in his appeal. TermsPrivacyDisclaimerCookiesDo Not Sell My Information, Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select, Stay up-to-date with FindLaw's newsletter for legal professionals. Although the OPS report citing police misconduct at Area 2 has been brought to light since the time defendant and her brothers were questioned there, that does not alter the fact that defendant did not raise the issue of police brutality as a basis for suppression until years later. Defense counsel explained that Tyrone, who would have asserted his fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination at defendant's first trial, would testify at a subsequent hearing. She asserts that had this court and Judge Toomin had the benefit of the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Thompson v. Keohane, 516 U.S. 99, 116 S.Ct. Anthony was bruised and bloody, apparently as a result of having been beaten. The trial court disagreed and dismissed the petition. Defendant must thus establish "that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different." Also, at no time did Judge Toomin state that he was denying the motion to suppress based upon the opinions of police officers who questioned defendant as to their belief regarding whether defendant was in custody.. 1. 69, 538 N.E.2d 444 (1988); People v. Mitchell, 297 Ill.App.3d 206, 209, 231 Ill.Dec. Their beloved father was a paraplegic who was also a wellestablished Southside Chicago businessman. A subpoena is a compulsory process for obtaining witnesses or documentary evidence in all criminal prosecutions and is guaranteed by the sixth amendment. The defendant was convicted following a second trial and he appealed arguing that the OPS report regarding abuse of arrestees at Area 2 was new evidence that was not available to the defendant prior to his first trial. In support of those motions, defendant alleged that the police had lacked probable cause to arrest him, that he was not advised of his constitutional rights at any time subsequent to his arrest, that his admissions were involuntary and the result of police coercion, and that Sheila had acted as an agent of the police. 887, 743 N.E.2d 1043 (2001). This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. On November 18, 1988, shortly after speaking with Sheila, police arrested defendant. We have vacated our prior opinion in a separate order and we determine that our prior decision to vacate the defendant's extended-term sentence was proper. A person is legally accountable for the conduct of another when either before or during the commission of an offense, and with the intent to promote or facilitate such commission, he solicits, aids, abets, agrees or attempts to aid the other person in the planning or commission of the offense. 241, 788 N.E.2d 1117. The special circumstances present in Jones was the fact that the appellate court had previously reversed the defendant's conviction and held that the trial court's denial of a motion to suppress as to one of three statements was erroneous. According to Cummings, defendant stated that Sheila Daniels shot McCoy in the back of his head while McCoy was seated in his car in his garage. M. Graham, Cleary & Graham's Handbook of Illinois Evidence 803.11, at 830 (7th ed.1999). After reciting the testimony at the hearing, we concluded as follows: Defendant's motion to suppress was denied. See M. Graham, Cleary & Graham's Handbook of Illinois Evidence 602.1, at 369 (7th ed.1999). He was handcuffed tightly to the wall and was not allowed to go to the washroom. McCoy was found shot to death on November 13, 1988 in the back seat of his Cadillac, which was parked in a Southside Chicago alley. People v. Enis, 163 Ill.2d 367, 386 [206 Ill.Dec. Defendant maintains that his trial counsel made "outlandish" arguments to the effect that defendant could not have killed McCoy because Sheila's gunshot had already killed him. Dr. Kalelkar stated, however, that if the bullet wound to the back of the neck was fired first, McCoy would have died instantly and thus, would have been dead at the time the two gunshot wounds to his forehead were inflicted. Absent an abuse of discretion, this court will not reverse the trial court's determination with respect to the admission of exhibits into evidence. It is improper for the jury to take items with them to the jury room during deliberations which have not been admitted into evidence. This argument is without merit. 721, 399 N.E.2d 1010); however, in this case, trial counsel presented what amounted to the most viable basis to support the motion to suppress. Therefore, only those facts necessary for proper consideration of the instant appeal will be repeated here. Sheila then entered the interrogation room and, after hugging defendant, told him loudly "to do whatever they say to do, we was (sic) gone (sic) go home and everything was gone (sic) be all right." Tyrone did not testify at defendant's motion to suppress. In resentencing defendant upon remand, we would point out to the trial court that this defendant had no convictions prior to committing this offense. Jack O'Malley, State's Atty., County of Cook, Chicago (Renee Goldfarb, Margaret J. Faustmann and Clare T. McEnery, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee. After a hearing pursuant to Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. After the defense rested, the State objected to the admission of the medical records into evidence, on the ground that a proper foundation had not been laid. 272, 475 N.E.2d 269.) We humbly honor the old school soul music era and will keep pushing forward to keep it alive. David McCoy (pictured in a framed photo in the above pic of Lisa Raye) was found shot to death on November 12, 1988 in the back seat of his Cadillac, which was parked in a Southside Chicago alley. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). The section of Cleary and Graham defendant relies upon relates to the personal knowledge requirement of testifying witnesses, not the requirements of admission of medical records. Defendant contends next that the trial court erred in not allowing the admission of medical records regarding treatment she had received following a beating from McCoy. In People v. Cannon, 293 Ill.App.3d 634, 227 Ill.Dec. Defendant agreed, and while accompanied by three officers, arrived at the police station around 5:30 p.m. that day. AIR Awareness Outreach; AIR Business Lunch & Learn; AIR Community of Kindness; AIR Dogs: Paws For Minds AIR Hero AIR & NJAMHAA Conference Justice DiVITO delivered the opinion of the court: After a bench trial, defendant Tyrone Daniels was found guilty of first degree murder (Ill.Rev.Stat.1987, ch. airbnb with pool in detroit, michigan; firefly axolotl for sale twitter; super bowl 2022 halftime show memes instagram; what happened to suzanne pleshette voice youtube When the police arrived at defendant's apartment, Cummings and several other officers knocked on defendant's door and identified themselves. However, [i]n a criminal case, where one party is successful in contesting a pretrial order on appeal, reversal and remandment does not preclude the trial court from considering other issues originally raised in the pretrial proceedings but not finally determined by the appellate court on the merits. [People v. Feagans, 134 Ill.App.3d 252, 257, 89 Ill.Dec. 499, 734 N.E.2d 207 (2000), where this court stated: [P]rinciples of collateral estoppel do not bar relitigation of a pretrial ruling after remand, where special circumstances are present. In Crespo, the defendant stabbed the victim 24 times with an eight-inch knife and pulled her hair with such force that part of her scalp was torn from her head. As the State properly asserts, this court is unable, based upon the record, to determine the merits of defendant's claim. The record reflects that he testified that he had been struck, but he also testified that he did not make his statement because of this mistreatment, he made it because defendant told him to cooperate. at 2362-63, 147 L.Ed.2d at 455. Call: daylight david baldacci ending explained; Email: soho house festival 2022 date; Toggle navigation 1825 train explosion best friend of charleston. Defendant also argues that Judge Urso should have held a hearing on her motion to suppress based upon the Supreme Court's decision in Stansbury v. California, 511 U.S. 318, 114 S.Ct. Sheila Daniels "basically asked how [defendant] was doing. We follow those decisions and therefore, we vacate defendant's sentence and remand for imposition of a new sentence. David Ray Mccoy was brutally killed on 13 November 1988, in Chicago, Cook County, Illinois, USA, at the age of 53 years. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm defendant's conviction, vacate her sentence and remand for resentencing. During argument on defendant's motion, defense counsel argued that new evidence, that being testimony from defendant's brothers, was now available. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Defendant testified at her suppression hearing before Judge Toomin that she had seen Anthony while at the police station and he appeared to have been beaten. Make an enquiry and our team will be get in touch with you ASAP. Defendant lastly argues that defense counsel improperly refused to allow him to testify. After denial of her motion, defendant filed written offers of proof, which stated that, if called to testify at a hearing, Tyrone and Anthony would substantiate the allegations of abuse contained in her second amended motion to suppress. 143, 706 N.E.2d 1017 (1998), this court addressed the defendant's contention on appeal that he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his postconviction petition because he had new evidence which showed systematic torture at Area 2. On remand, the trial court allowed the State to use the other two statements that the appellate court had not addressed. 241, 788 N.E.2d 1117 (2003). Defendant now appeals. Cannon, 293 Ill.App.3d at 642-43, 227 Ill.Dec. [People v. Henderson, 36 Ill.App.3d 355, 370, 344 N.E.2d 239 (1976).] In Hobley I, the supreme court found that it was not error for the trial court to bar the testimony at trial of three people who claimed they had also been abused by the same officer who abused Hobley. Counsel further explained that Anthony's testimony, which Judge Toomin had precluded at the previous hearing, would also be presented. See People v. Golden, 342 Ill.App.3d 820, 277 Ill.Dec. Categories . She was not in custody. According to defendant, upon hearing this testimony, which established that she had not been advised of her Miranda rights because of the officer's conclusions, Judge Urso should have reconsidered his previous rulings, and granted a hearing. 256, 637 N.E.2d 992 (1994) (Hobley I), and People v. Hobley, 182 Ill.2d 404, 231 Ill.Dec. Under similar facts, the same result was reached in People v. King, 192 Ill.2d 189, 198-99, 248 Ill.Dec. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case. In Daniels I, defendant argued, inter alia, that Judge Toomin had erred in denying her motion to suppress statements. The State appealed the suppression order, but only challenged the standard that the trial court applied. 553, 696 N.E.2d 849 (1998). Wilson v. Clark, 84 Ill.2d 186, 192, 49 Ill.Dec. * * * She said, just tell him the truth. On January 23, 1997, defendant filed her Reoffered Second Amended Motion to Quash Arrest and Suppress Statements, which was identical to her second amended motion to suppress. 1827, 1838, 144 L.Ed.2d 35, 53 (1999). During the trial, the court was presented with transcripts of testimony from several witnesses in Sheila Daniels' jury trial. 38, par. In her second amended motion to quash arrest and suppress statements filed on May 21, 1996, defendant again alleged she had made admissions due to the physical abuse Tyrone had endured at the hands of the police. David's death shocked many of his business associates as he spoke fondly of Daniels, and the two had been together for over ten years. 0. david ray mccoy sheila daniels chicago. 185, 786 N.E.2d 1019 (2003), to determine whether a different result is warranted. With respect to her fourth amendment claim, he found that defendant had voluntarily accompanied police to the station. The order was affirmed on appeal. Constitutionality of extended term sentence. She further alleged that prior to seeing her brother Anthony in a beaten condition, police had threatened to charge her and/or Anthony with McCoy's murder for which they could receive the death penalty. The trial testimony of Anna Democopoulos, the assistant State's Attorney who interviewed defendant, essentially corroborated Cummings' testimony. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 688-89, 104 S.Ct. Defendant eloquently states her position in her reply brief, where she explains that in her view: [T]he [law of the case] doctrine applies not to motions' as such, but, rather, to legal issues determined almost invariably after a hearing. In doing so, we relied upon the United States Supreme Court's decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. Similarly, in Hinton, this court rejected the defendant's argument that the postconviction court erred in quashing his subpoenas requesting any complaints involving excessive force against the officers identified in the defendant's case. 38, par. 303, 585 N.E.2d 1325. Defendant argues that the reopening of her case is not barred by the doctrine of law of the case because in Daniels I we ruled, with respect to her motion to suppress, that she had voluntarily accompanied police to the station and that investigators did not employ a ruse in order to induce her to leave her home. Cook County. In the instant case, the defendant shot her live-in boyfriend by shooting him. at 465, 133 L.Ed.2d at 394. Further, defendant cannot liken his situation to that of the defendant in People v. Rhoads (1979), 73 Ill.App.3d 288, 29 Ill.Dec. He was 52 years old at the time. In reliance upon Cannon, Patterson and King, defendant argues the OPS report constitutes new evidence, entitling her to a hearing on her reoffered amended motion to suppress. McCoys then 32 year old live-in girlfriend of 10 years, Sheila Daniels, and her then 20 year old brother, Tyrone, were convicted of McCoys murder in 1990. In rejecting the State's argument, this court relied on the holding of our supreme court in People v. Williams, 138 Ill.2d 377, 150 Ill.Dec. In his first appeal, the defendant did not challenge the trial court's pretrial denial of his motions to quash arrest and suppress evidence. 453, 685 N.E.2d 908 (1997). The proffered testimony of Tyrone and Anthony was included with the motion, substantiating the allegations of abuse contained in defendant's motion. George M. Zuganelis, Berwyn, for defendant-appellant. In People v. Hinton, 302 Ill.App.3d 614, 236 Ill.Dec. On direct examination, defendant testified to an incident that occurred in May of 1980 where McCoy had pistol whipped her about the head with a gun while the two sat in a car. While this court in Daniels I did not provide an analysis of our holding affirming the trial court's denial of defendant's motion to suppress based on fifth and sixth amendment grounds, we certainly addressed the legal issue raised by defendant and we rejected it. A South Side woman has been convicted for the second time of killing millionaire David Ray McCoy, her live-in boyfriend, in 1988. . According to reports, sadly, he was brutally murdered in 1988, and his daughters were left fatherless. McCoy, 53, a self-made millionaire and bon vivant, was found dead in the back seat of his black Cadillac on Nov. 12, 1988. Nowhere does the record indicate that defendant was somehow controlled or dominated by his sister or that he would abide by her wishes to his own detriment. The Jones court subsequently found this error did not require reversal. 604, 645 N.E.2d 856 (1994). It was further argued that whether defendant's status at the police station became custodial before she was informed she was under arrest at 3 a.m. had not been previously raised. In so ruling, the Court stated that the ultimate determination for whether a defendant is in custody for Miranda purposes involved [t]wo discrete inquiries ***: first, what were the circumstances surrounding the interrogation; and second, given those circumstances, would a reasonable person have felt he or she was not at liberty to terminate the interrogation and leave. Thompson, 516 U.S. at 112, 116 S.Ct. 5-2(c); People v. Foster (1990), 198 Ill.App.3d 986, 145 Ill.Dec. We do not dispute that the medical records in question are relevant. People v. Shukovsky, 128 Ill.2d 210, 222, 131 Ill.Dec. IV. There are variousreports of the motive behind McCoys murder. Defendant was clearly aware that she had seen Tyrone and he had been injured. 18-2(a)), and concealment of a homicidal death (Ill.Rev.Stat.1987, ch. But if the legal issue has never been presented to a trial court and a hearing conducted thereon, and/or if the court has never issued a ruling on the precise legal issue then the doctrine of the law of the case simply cannot be applied because, in reality, there is no law of the case to apply. 58, 539 N.E.2d 368 (1989), this court stated: With regard to pretrial motions to suppress evidence, the rule is that once a motion to suppress has been ruled upon by one judge, that motion cannot be relitigated later before another judge, absent a showing of exceptional circumstances or of additional evidence that has become available since the first hearing to suppress. Sheila Daniels, 41, first convicted in 1990, was. As for the voluntariness of her confession, Judge Toomin, citing People v. Dodds, 190 Ill.App.3d 1083, 138 Ill.Dec. She asked to call Vrdolyak during the polygraph exam. Daniels was sentenced Tuesday to the maximum term of 80 years--the same sentence she received after her first trial--for firing the first and fatal shot. People v. Patterson, 154 Ill.2d 414, 468, 182 Ill.Dec. In an amended postconviction petition, the defendant argued the existence of new evidence, that being the OPS report, warranted a hearing on his petition.
david ray mccoy sheila daniels chicago